The Body in School: A Forgotten Dimension
In late November 2020, the Ministry of National Education launched the “30 Minutes of Daily Physical Activity at School” initiative to combat sedentary lifestyles among children. This was already a significant problem before the COVID-19 pandemic, and widespread lockdowns have made it even more acute, as initial scientific studies have shown.
Sylvain Wagnon, University of Montpellier and Fabien Groeninger, University of Montpellier
Beyond this measure—and the awareness it implies—the role of the body in learning remains an open question. Is this not one of the great oversights in the history of French education? How can we today envision an education system that takes into account the whole child, in order to foster the development and empowerment of all?
The Rise of Physical Education
The ministry’s proposal to promote physical activity among students is in line with the international Daily Mile initiative. Launched in Scotland in 2012, this program encourages children in all schools to run one mile—or more than 1,500 meters—every day.
The stated goal in France is to combat the consequences of a sedentary lifestyle, and physical activity there is limited to motor skills. In Finland, however, the Finnish Schools on the Move initiative is much more comprehensive and aims to integrate physical activity into the daily school schedule, rather than confining it to a single class.
On a voluntary basis, more than 90% of Finnish schools participate in the program. Recess periods are scheduled regularly so that children do not remain seated for more than two hours, while relaxation exercises help students focus on all their schoolwork.
In France, physical education has certainly been part of the school curriculum for a long time, and the Third Republic even assigned it civic, patriotic, health-related, and economic objectives. Gradually, the sporting aspect was taken into account—particularly under the Popular Front with Jean Zay, who saw it as a measure of social justice and equality. But it was not until 1962 that the discipline was officially established as an institutional subject.
Nevertheless, physical education remains a subject that must constantly reaffirm its legitimacy in the face of so-called “intellectual” disciplines. This turbulent history of the relationship between physical and intellectual education partly explains why physical education teachers were not fully integrated into the National Education system until 1981—they had previously been under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Youth and Sports.
Historical taboo
The pioneering work of Pierre Arnaud, Georges Vigarello, Jacqueline Descarpentries, and Bernard Andrieu has highlighted this prioritization of cognitive learning over physical learning, largely for religious and political reasons. The body, perceived as an obstacle and a source of disruption, is excluded from the school setting. It is an obedient, tamed, and standardized body that the French school system has shaped through the centuries-old classroom format, where children sit all day long.
There has long been a real taboo surrounding the body in schools, as well as regarding knowledge of the body and taking children’s biological rhythms into account in the learning process.
See also:
Standing in class may help children learn
The recurring question is whether the body is part of the person being educated or whether it simply accompanies that person to school. Earth and Life Sciences (SVT) curricula address this knowledge of the body, as well as education on health, hygiene, and sexuality. Yet the body remains a subject of debate, poorly understood, and burdened by numerous stereotypes.
In a report by the French Institute of Education, Marie Gaussel clearly highlights the many educational and political aspects of the body’s place in schools, but above all its consistently marginal status.
Prioritization of Learning
The mind-body dualism characterizes the French school system through the dichotomy between cognitive learning and physical, manual, and emotional learning. However, this hierarchy of body and mind reflects a misunderstanding of the mechanisms of learning, motivation, and interest in children, which have been highlighted by child psychology and progressive education since the late19th century.
Specific activities, such as yoga, are beginning to be incorporated into school curricula. However, it would also be important to offer activities that help develop the various aspects of a child’s personality.
Marianne Lenoir ’s work in educational science highlights the importance of taking the body into account when understanding well-being at school, as well as motivation. This is also a key aspect of alternative pedagogies—whether Freinet, Decroly, Montessori, or Steiner—which reminds us that the concept of holistic education—that is, taking into account the different facets of the human being and refusing to compartmentalize cognitive, physical, and psychological development—is a long-standing one. As early as 1869, the anarchist educator Paul Robin had made it a matter of individual and collective emancipation.
Can holistic education be the future of the French public education system? The body cannot be reduced to mere components of a curriculum: it is an integral part of any comprehensive discussion of our education system. Current debates highlight the need to transform the practices and objectives of the French education system and the the need to move beyond the compartmentalization of academic disciplines. This is just one step among many toward reimagining a new approach to education that respects the individuality of learners.
Sylvain Wagnon, Professor of Education, Faculty of Education, University of Montpellier and Fabien Groeninger, Research Associate at Lirdef (Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Research Didactics, Education, and Training), University of Montpellier
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Readthe original article.