What are the main responsibilities of a medical examiner during mass disasters?
In areas around Kyiv, such as Bucha and Mariupol in particular, the recent discovery of mass graves has sparked outrage. Ukrainian authorities have reported that hundreds of civilians were massacred by the Russian military, a claim the Kremlin denies.
Laurent Martrille, University of Montpellier
Just Click’s With A Camera – Flickr
Over the past two months, Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Iryna Venediktova has launched more than 7,000 investigations, and many countries—including France—have sent teams of experts to assist.
In general, what roles do forensic pathologists play in situations involving mass fatalities? And how does international collaboration work? An overview of the procedures typically implemented by Laurent Martrille, a forensic pathologist, associate professor at the University of Montpellier, and member of the French Society of Forensic Medicine and Medical Expertise (SFMLEM) and the Montpellier Team for Criminal Law and Forensic Sciences (EDPFM). He is also a reserve physician at the National Gendarmerie’s Institute for Criminal Research (IRCGN) and has previously been commissioned by the International Criminal Court.
The Conversation-France: What are the main responsibilities of a medical examiner at a mass casualty scene?
Laurent Martrille: A medical examiner has two main responsibilities: identifying the victims and determining the causes and circumstances of death.
However, in this context, identifying the victims is the primary task in which the medical examiner is involved. Every country has specialized teams for this purpose.
In France, the UNIVC (National Unit for the Identification of Disaster Victims) is responsible for this; it consists of two subunits:the UGIVC (Gendarmerie) and the UPIVC (Police). Each unit is composed of police officers or gendarmes (including specialists in DNA, fingerprints, etc.), forensic pathologists, and forensic dentists.
The UGIVC is part of the National Gendarmerie’s Criminal Investigation Institute (IRCGN) and is capable of operating anywhere in France; it can also be deployed internationally (a team was dispatched to the Lviv region, ed.). It has the necessary equipment to conduct remote operations—including radio communication, DNA analysis, autopsies, and more.
The second task—investigating the causes and circumstances of the death—is not always carried out: the relevant authorities may or may not assign this task. After the tsunami in Thailand on December 26, 2004, for example, the sole task was identification. The situation may differ when a third party is potentially involved, whether in an accident, a terrorist attack, or a war.
TCF: When there are many deceased individuals to identify and the specialized teams on site come from different countries, how do they work together?
L.M.: There is no room for improvisation (even though every disaster is different and requires adjustments). All procedures were strengthened and standardized following the 2004 tsunami, during which more than 5,000 bodies had to be identified. This massive modern-day disaster helped establish international standards.
Work is now carried out according to standardized procedures established by Interpol and available to everyone: the so-called “Disaster Victim Identification” (DVI) procedures. This enables teams responding to large-scale disasters to share protocols and results.
With regard to identification, these international standards are based on three so-called primary identifiers, which must be strictly adhered to. A body can only be identified if one of these has been used: fingerprints, DNA, or dental records.
To enable identification, two types of data must be collected so that they can then be compared:
- Postmortem data collected at the scene and from the body by medical examiners, dentists, and sometimes anthropologists and fingerprint experts.
- Data collected prior to death, obtained from families or, where applicable, from authorities in another country.
Interpol provides highly detailed post-mortem and ante-mortem forms to be filled out, featuring a very rigorous coding system to facilitate data comparison. Cross-referencing is performed using software, but ultimately, an identification commission—comprising judicial and local authorities from the countries involved, forensic pathologists, dentists, investigators, and others—reviews all the information before reaching a final decision.
In such circumstances, there are two key principles to follow: protocol and nothing but protocol… and adapting to the situation at hand, because every mission has its own unique characteristics, which often vary greatly from one situation to another. When you’re deployed in response to a tsunami or a plane crash, the circumstances are very different.
TCF: At what point does the medical examiner get involved?
L.M.: In theory, the medical examiner can be involved at every stage of the process. However, and as a general rule—barring exceptional circumstances—they do not participate in what we call the recovery of bodies or, depending on the situation, their exhumation; there are specialized teams for that, although a medical examiner may accompany them. Our presence on site may be beneficial when there are very few bodies.
When there are a very large number of deaths, the added value of our on-site response is limited. Moreover, even though identification teams can be mobilized quickly, out of respect for the deceased, it is not possible to leave bodies on site—in the streets, for example—before the arrival of forensic experts. There is then an initial “collection,” which is carried out by local authorities without Interpol coding.
This had been the case with the tsunami: the bodies were initially numbered according to Thai standards, and then renumbered to facilitate international cooperation.
The specialized teams in charge of this stage follow Interpol procedures: with precise numbering and specific coding. Each body or body part is placed in a separate bag and labeled… Everything is planned and organized, and then the bodies are transferred to the morgues where we operate.
Another point: in some cases, it may be necessary for bomb disposal experts or specialists trained in CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear) risks to secure the area. They ensure that there is no risk—or that the risk has been eliminated—or decontaminate the scene if necessary. The bodies themselves may have been contaminated (chemically, biologically) or even booby-trapped.
This means there is a lot of preliminary vetting involved to ensure that doctors and investigators are not exposed to additional threats. It’s fairly rare, but it’s a very serious responsibility.
TCF: All these preliminary steps will delay the point at which forensic teams can get involved. Is there a risk of losing information?
L.M.: Obviously, it is not possible to leave bodies exposed to the open air for extended periods. That is why, depending on the circumstances, initial exhumations are carried out to ensure (very) limited preservation. Ideally, of course, the bodies should be placed in refrigerated storage units.
When remains are scattered over a fairly large area, they cannot be left on site for days while arrangements are made and a medical examiner conducts the on-site recovery of the bodies… it’s a matter of common sense and basic respect for the deceased.
The recovery of bodies, even when carried out with the utmost precision, will inevitably interfere with the subsequent investigation. However, following international protocols allows us to begin working with the evidence collected at the scene.
The most important thing is to implement solutions for storing bodies at low temperatures. The standard storage temperature is 4 °C. In Thailand, there were dozens and dozens of refrigerated containers.
TCF: How is the process of identifying bodies arriving at the morgue carried out?
L.M.: Depending on the circumstances (number of bodies, state of preservation, etc.) and the personnel available, when a body arrives, we usually perform X-rays, and now CT scans (when possible). This allows us to retain accurate digital data once the body has been returned to the family.
Next, investigators establish two lines of inquiry:
- The "X is believed to be So-and-so" approach: for example, when a body is carrying identification. This helps speed up the process, since there are clues that can guide the investigation. But be careful—there’s no certainty: you might be carrying someone else’s ID…
- The "X" category: when there is no information available to determine the identity.
The first step in this process is usually the collection of fingerprints. Next, we begin by examining and documenting the clothing before undressing the body; if necessary, samples (such as oil residues, etc.) may be collected at this stage by specialized technicians, at our recommendation.
Any evidence recovered from a body, as well as items collected at the scene, is sealed under conditions that will allow for their potential analysis at a later date. Each sample is sealed and packaged in a specific manner.
Once undressed, the body undergoes an external examination to note any details that may aid in its identification or help establish connections: measurements, tattoos, clothing, injuries, and scars, etc.
There may be situations where bodies are severely decomposed, or even reduced to nothing more than skeletal remains; in such cases, forensic anthropologists are called in. Obviously, much data is lost—such as fingerprints—but the bones retain information about age, sex, height, biogeographic origins, and, where applicable, signs of trauma.
At the end of this stage, a DNA sample is collected. This may be taken from the wound site if the body is fragmented, or by making an incision in a muscle. Dentists are the last to perform their work.
It is also possible to conduct so-called contact DNA testing on items such as personal belongings or clothing… However, if the bodies were piled into mass graves, for example, or handled carelessly during recovery, the risk of contamination from another body is very high: the value of contact DNA—which would allow for the identification of individuals who touched or harmed the victim while they were alive—is then compromised. As a result, the usefulness of such surface samples becomes limited.
At the end of this process, a quality control check is conducted to ensure that nothing has been overlooked. Effective coordination allows for swift action: in France, the 86 victims of the July 14, 2016, attack in Nice were identified within four and a half days.
The identifying information is therefore provided jointly by the dentist, the medical examiner, and even the anthropologist. Note that the medical examiner does not perform the identification himself: like the anthropologist, he provides clues to aid in identification, but he also collects DNA samples for later analysis. The dentist, on the other hand, provides the evidence that allows the identification committee to make a direct identification. However, the only person who can determine, if requested, the cause of death is the medical examiner.
TCF: What happens when a medical examiner is assigned to determine the cause of death?
L.M.: An autopsy to determine the cause of death is performed only at the request of the authorities, as this is not part of UNIVC’s usual duties.
As mentioned earlier, any external items removed from the body are handed over to investigators: clothing, as well as any possible ties and personal belongings, etc. Samples may be taken from these items for further analysis.
In addition, we look for any signs of injury or violence on the skin, as well as through an autopsy of the body. Suppose the person had been subjected to torture or violence; in that case, a description of any injuries would be essential to understanding the circumstances of the death or the events leading up to it.
When the death occurred recently and the body has been preserved under optimal conditions, the marks are still perfectly visible, and we can provide fairly precise details.
The more time passes, the more complicated it becomes. Decomposition will hinder external examinations, yet skin analysis is crucial because it provides essential information about the types of injuries (ballistic, blunt force trauma, ligature marks, etc.).
However, even when the bodies have decomposed to such an extent that only bones remain, evidence can still be found. Any marks on the bone, if they exist, are “frozen” in time: the bone retains the memory of the injuries and how they occurred. However, determining the cause of death becomes much more complicated—and is often impossible… For example, one might observe a severe head injury, fatal in itself, but if the cause of death is secondary to a bullet that passed through the body without marking the bones, nothing will be visible (since the observed head injury could have been inflicted after death).
It is also important to remember that we do not work alone: experts from all forensic laboratories (in ballistics, toxicology, DNA analysis, entomology—determining the time of death based on scavenging insects—fire trace analysis, soil analysis, etc.) can be called upon to assist.
Every step of the process is documented through photographs and, in some cases, video recordings. This meticulous attention to detail is essential for facilitating discussions among experts and minimizing the possibility of future disputes.
Once identification and/or autopsy procedures are complete, the bodies are prepared (to the extent possible) so they can be presented to the families, who have the right, under all circumstances, to view them before burial. Families receive support during this very difficult time. The goal is to return the deceased to their loved ones as quickly as possible once identification is confirmed.
Laurent Martrille, Associate Professor at the University of Montpellier, Hospital Physician at Montpellier University Hospital, EDPFM, University of Montpellier
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Readthe original article.