[LUM#18] “Coastal risk management must be cross-regional or it won’t work”
In the Gulf of Lion, 25% of the coastline is eroding. This widespread phenomenon, which is accompanied by the risk of coastal flooding, raises questions about inter-territorial relations, particularly in Montpellier, where spatial restructuring cannot take place without dialogue between the metropolitan area and coastal municipalities. Insights from political science researchers Sylvain Barone (G-Eau) and Laura Michel (Cepel), authors of the book *Metropolis and Coastal Risks*.
This “Popsu” study (a platform for observing urban projects and strategies) was conducted in collaboration with the Montpellier metropolitan area. What are the specific political characteristics of this region?
S.B.: Coastal risk management policies emphasize the importance of planning on a scale larger than just the beach. Montpellier, as a metropolitan area, is central to this equation, but from an institutional standpoint, it includes only one directly coastal municipality: Villeneuve-lès-Maguelone. The other coastal municipalities in the urban area are part of the Pays de l’Or Urban Community (POA). Coastal risks have long been an oversight in Montpellier’s policy-making. That is no longer the case.
Which jurisdictions are responsible for these risks?
L.M.: The risk of flooding remains a matter for the state. Erosion, on the other hand, is considered a gradual natural risk that can be anticipated through local land-use policies. It is therefore largely the responsibility of local stakeholders. Under the Climate and Resilience Act, municipalities affected by coastal erosion will be required to incorporate a map of eroding areas into their urban planning documents, with implications for building regulations.
Is there no dialogue between the metropolitan area and the coastal municipalities on these issues?
S.B.: There has been a history of conflict between Montpellier and these municipalities, but it is beginning to ease. A major study was conducted on the future governance of the Gulf of Aigues-Mortes (GAM). It provided an opportunity for dialogue between Montpellier and neighboring intermunicipal communities, as well as with various public institutions, the Water Agency, the French Office for Biodiversity… Coastal risk management will be inter-territorial or it will not be at all (Midi Libre 04/28/2023).
Has the government completely withdrawn from the issue of coastal erosion?
L.M.: No, as part of the Plan Littoral 21, the Region, the government, and the Banque des Territoires are supporting six regions in implementing local strategies for coastal management and spatial restructuring. The aim is to build on existing forms of cooperation. For the Gulf of Aigues-Mortes, the study serves as a stepping stone for developing this strategy.
Could it take the form of joint governance?
S.B.: Based on the GAM study, local authorities opted for a system of agreements that relies on the consent of all parties and allows for greater flexibility. Another option would have been a joint association-type structure, but that would have entailed decision-making by majority vote. Minority local authorities might have been forced to implement measures with which they did not agree.
L.M.: At the regional level, one possible form of governance was the public interest group, but the stakeholders did not want to add another layer to the already complex web of existing structures. But it’s clear that progress is being made; the stakeholders are participating in workshops and are actively involved.
The metropolitan area is sometimes criticized for being a tool that pits regions against each other in economic competition. Is it effective when it comes to environmental issues?
S.B.: It’s a legitimate question, but at the local level, no other local authority has as many resources and expertise to support this spatial restructuring. Should the metropolitan area decide and manage everything on its own? No, of course not. In fact, we’re moving toward forms of governance that promote more symmetrical relationships among public actors. Beyond involving citizens and organizations, it will be interesting to foster a public discourse around these issues.
Isn’t there also a disconnect between the electoral and ecological timelines?
L.M.: Issues of risk adaptation require looking ahead several decades and adopting an integrated approach that goes beyond short-term, operational urban planning. The metropolitan area doesn’t necessarily have the tools to involve citizens in issues that are often presented as technical but are eminently political because they involve choices that will have a very significant impact on people. It’s not easy for an elected official to tell their constituents that they’ll have to move; they shouldn’t have to bear that burden alone.
What options do we have to address these coastal risks?
L.M.: Climate change will cause sea levels to rise; this is irreversible. But the problems we face today are primarily due to extensive coastal development and the exploitation of rivers upstream. We need to reevaluate our urbanization model.
S.B.: We also need to reevaluate the tourism model, but talking about spatial restructuring at campgrounds or beachfront hotels is complicated.
Is this a lack of political will on the part of local governments?
L.M.: They’re caught between conflicting demands. They’re told they need to reduce land use, move toward net zero land take, account for risks, and so on. But they’re also expected to build housing, and their revenue largely comes from urban development and tourism.
S.B.: This region faces both extremely significant challenges related to population density, public facilities, major infrastructure, agriculture, and biodiversity, as well as very serious constraints involving risks of coastal flooding, but also runoff, river overflow, and wildfires… Montpellier is almost a borderline case, which makes it a fascinating area for research.
UM podcasts are now available on your favorite platform (Spotify, Deezer, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Music, etc.).